Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 229
Filter
1.
Audiol., Commun. res ; 29: e2778, 2024. tab, graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1533839

ABSTRACT

RESUMO Objetivo Avaliar a contribuição da tecnologia de escuta assistida em usuários de implante coclear (IC) em situações de reverberação e ruído. Métodos Estudo transversal prospectivo aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética Institucional (CAAE 8 3031418.4.0000.0068). Foram selecionados adolescentes e adultos usuários de IC com surdez pré ou pós-lingual. Para usuários bilaterais, cada orelha foi avaliada separadamente. O reconhecimento de fala foi avaliado por meio de listas gravadas de palavras dissílabas apresentadas a 65 dBA a 0° azimute com e sem o Mini Microfone2 (Cochlear™) conectado ao processador de fala Nucleus®6. A reverberação da sala foi medida como 550 ms. Para avaliar a contribuição do dispositivo de escuta assistida (DEA) em ambiente reverberante, o reconhecimento de fala foi avaliado no silêncio. Para avaliar a contribuição do DEA em reverberação e ruído, o reconhecimento de fala foi apresentado a 0° azimute com o ruído proveniente de 8 alto-falantes dispostos simetricamente a 2 metros de distância do centro com ruído de múltiplos falantes usando relação sinal-ruído de +10dB. Para evitar viés de aprendizado ou fadiga, a ordem dos testes foi randomizada. A comparação das médias foi analisada pelo teste t para amostras pareadas, adotando-se nível de significância de p<0,005. Resultados Dezessete pacientes com idade média de 40 anos foram convidados e concordaram em participar, sendo 2 participantes bilaterais, totalizando 19 orelhas. Houve contribuição positiva significante do Mini Mic2 na reverberação e ruído+reverberação (p<0,001). Conclusão DEA foi capaz de melhorar o reconhecimento de fala de usuários de IC tanto em situações de reverberação quanto ruidosas.


ABSTRACT Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the contribution of assistive listening technology with wireless connectivity in cochlear implant (CI) users in reverberating and noise situations. Methods Prospective cross-sectional study approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (CAAE 8 3031418.4.0000.0068). Adolescents and adults CI users with pre- or post-lingual deafness were selected. For bilateral users, each ear was assessed separately. Speech recognition was assessed using recorded lists of disyllabic words presented at 65 dBA at 0° azimuth with and without the Wireless Mini Microphone 2 (Cochlear™) connected to the Nucleus®6 speech processor. Room reverberation was measured as 550 ms. To assess the contribution of the assistive listening device (ALD) in a reverberating environment, speech recognition was assessed in quiet. To assess the contribution of the ALD in reverberation and noise, speech recognition was presented at 0° azimuth along with the noise coming from 8 loudspeakers symmetrically arranged 2 meters away from the center with multi-talker babble noise using signal to noise ratio of +10dB. To avoid learning bias or fatigue, the order of the tests was randomized. Comparison of means was analyzed by t test for paired samples, adopting significance level of p <0.005. Results Seventeen patients with a mean age of 40 years were invited and agreed to participate, with 2 bilateral participants, totaling 19 ears assessed. There was a significant positive contribution from the Mini Mic2 in reverberation, and noise+reverberation (p <0.001). Conclusion ALD was able to improve speech recognition of CI users in both reverberation and noisy situations.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Self-Help Devices , Noise Measurement , Cochlear Implantation , Deafness , Voice Recognition , Speech Intelligibility , Cross-Sectional Studies
2.
CoDAS ; 36(1): e20220177, 2024. tab, graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1528447

ABSTRACT

RESUMO Objetivo Desenvolver guia para elaboração de relatórios fonoaudiológicos de crianças implantadas para serem compartilhados entre fonoaudiólogos dos serviços de implante coclear (IC) e reabilitadores. Método O método Delphi foi utilizado para selecionar os itens relevantes e fundamentais que deveriam constar nas duas versões propostas para compor o guia: Guia 1 - Relatórios fonoaudiológicos fornecidos pelo serviço de IC aos reabilitadores, e Guia 2 - Relatórios fonoaudiológicos fornecidos pelos reabilitadores aos serviços de IC. Vinte e um fonoaudiólogos especialistas e com experiência na área de implante coclear e de reabilitação auditiva participaram da discussão e do julgamento dos itens durante as rodadas de seleção. Considerou-se consenso quando o item obteve a concordância igual ou superior a 80% entre os participantes, sendo selecionados para comporem os dois guias. Resultados Após as duas rodadas, 21 itens do Guia 1 obtiveram consenso entre os terapeutas, ou seja, mais de 80% deles concordaram que estes itens deveriam estar presentes no relatório enviado pelo serviço de IC. Para o Guia 2, 22 itens analisados pelos fonoaudiólogos atuantes em serviços de IC setor pós-operatório, foram selecionados na segunda rodada. Conclusão A partir da análise das duas rodadas, foi desenvolvido o "Guia para a elaboração de relatórios fonoaudiológicos: intersecção entre serviço de IC e reabilitadores". Este material pode ser aplicado na rotina de acompanhamento de crianças implantadas, padronizando as informações compartilhadas sobre o dispositivo eletrônico, resultados de avaliações, monitoramento dos resultados e processo terapêutico dessa população.


ABSTRACT Purpose To develop a guide for the preparation of speech-language reports of implanted children to be shared among speech-language pathologists of cochlear implant (CI) services and rehabilitation professionals. Methods The Delphi method was used to select the relevant and fundamental items that should be included in the two versions proposed for the guide: Guide 1 - Speech-language reports provided by the CI services to rehabilitators, and Guide 2 - Speech-language reports provided by the rehabilitators to CI services. Twenty-one speech therapists specialized and with experience in cochlear implants and auditory rehabilitation participated in the discussion and judgment of the items during the selection rounds. Consensus was considered when the item reached agreement equal to or greater than 80% among participants, being selected to compose the two guides. Results After the two rounds, 21 items from Guide 1 reached consensus among therapists, that is, more than 80% of them agreed that these items should be present in the report sent by the CI service. For Guide 2, 22 items analyzed by speech therapists working in CI services in the postoperative sector were selected in the second round. Conclusion Based on the analysis of the two rounds, the "Guide for the preparation of speech-language pathology reports: intersection between CI service and rehabilitators" was developed. This material can be applied in the follow-up of implanted children, standardizing the information shared about the electronic device, evaluation results, monitoring of results and therapeutic process of this population.

3.
Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 27(3): 445-454, Jul.-Sept. 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1514246

ABSTRACT

Abstract Introduction Despite the developing technology of cochlear implants (CIs), implanted prelingual hearing-impaired children exhibit variable speech processing outcomes. When these children match in personal and implant-related criteria, the CI outcome variability could be related to higher-order cognitive impairment. Objectives To evaluate different domains of cognitive function in good versus poor CI performers using a multidisciplinary approach and to find the relationship between these functions and different levels of speech processing. Methods This observational, cross-sectional study used the word recognition score (WRS) test to categorize 40 children with CIs into 20 good (WRS/65%) and 20 poor performers (WRS < 65%). All participants were examined for speech processing at different levels (auditory processing and spoken language) and cognitive functioning using (1) verbal tests (verbal component of Stanford-Binet intelligence [SBIS], auditory memory, auditory vigilance, and P300); and (2) performance tasks (performance components of SBIS, and trail making test). Results The outcomes of speech processing at different functional levels and both domains of cognitive function were analyzed and correlated. Speech processing was impaired significantly in poor CI performers. This group also showed a significant cognitive function deficit, in which the verbal abilities were more affected (in 93.5%) than in the good performers (in 69.5%). Moreover, cognitive function revealed a significant correlation and predictive effect on the CI speech outcomes. Conclusion Cognitive function impairment represented an important factor that underlies the variable speech proficiency in cochlear-implanted children. A multidisciplinary evaluation of cognitive function would provide a comprehensive overview to improve training strategies.

4.
Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 27(3): 487-498, Jul.-Sept. 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1514249

ABSTRACT

Abstract Introduction Between 15% to 30% of individuals with bilateral prelingual sensorineural hearing loss present with associated disabilities. Cochlear implant (CI) is an alternative treatment that provides consistent access to environmental and speech sounds, which results in significant benefits regarding quality of life and auditory and language development. Objectives To study the auditory and communicative performance of individuals with CI and delayed neuropsychomotor development after a minimum of five years using the device. Methods A total of eight patients were included in the study. We collected the multidisciplinary clinical records of participants, as well as the answers for the questionnaires applied remotely, which included the Children with Cochlear Implants: Parental Perspectives (CCIPP), International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Children and Youth Version (ICF-CY), and the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS). Results We found that throughout the years of CI use, the auditory threshold means improved significantly in all tested frequencies, as did the speech detection threshold and the language and hearing results. Regarding parental perception, parents evaluated aspects related to their children's social relations to be positive, and had worse perceptions regarding aspects related to their education. Conclusion We observed a progression in the participants' auditory and language skills throughout the years of CI use; even in the presence of other associated disabilities. Future multicentric studies with larger samples are needed to further the advancement of rehabilitation in patients with other associated disabilities.

5.
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery ; (12): 478-482, 2023.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-982771

ABSTRACT

Objective:The auditory and speech rehabilitation effects were assessed by the Categories of Auditory Performance(CAP) and the speech intelligibility rating scale(SIR) after cochlear implantation(CI) in prelingually elderly patients by telephone follow-up or face-to-face conversation. Methods:The clinical data of the prelingually deaf patients who underwent unilateral CI in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Shanxi People's Hospital, from December 2016 to December 2021 were collected. Thirty-eight patients were divided into Group A(SIR 1, 17 cases), Group B(SIR 2, 10 cases) and Group C(SIR 3, 11 cases) according to the preoperative SIR Score. Nineteen patients with post-lingual hearing impairment were selected as the control group(Group D, 19 cases). The effects of hearing and speech rehabilitation were evaluated using CAP and SIR Scores before surgery, 6 months after startup, and 1 year after startup. Results:There were no significant differences in CAP scores among the three groups of patients with prelingually deaf patients at 6 months and 1 year after startup(P>0.05), but there were significant differences between group A and group D at 6 months and 1 year after startup(P<0.05); the SIR Score of group A had statistical difference before surgery and 6 months after startup(P<0.05), group B had statistical difference before surgery and 1 year after startup(P<0.05), and group C and D had no statistical difference before surgery and 6 months and 1 year after startup, respectively(P>0.05). Conclusion:For the prelingually deaf elderly patients, hearing will develop rapidly 6 months after startup, and the effect of postoperative auditory rehabilitation was positively correlated with the preoperative speech ability. In the aspect of speech, the prelingually dear elderly patients who have poor preoperative speech ability could benefit more from CI early after surgery. CI is not contraindicated in prelingually deaf elderly patients, even those with poor preoperative speech function.


Subject(s)
Humans , Aged , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cochlear Implants , Speech Perception , Deafness/rehabilitation , Hearing Tests , Speech Intelligibility , Treatment Outcome
6.
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery ; (12): 329-333, 2023.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-982743

ABSTRACT

Objective:To report the experience of using CT-guided cochlear implant surgery in difficult cases such as severe inner ear deformities and anatomical abnormalities, and to discuss the application value of intraoperative CT-assisted localization in difficult cases of cochlear implant surgery. Methods:Retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 23 cases of difficult cochlear implant surgery cases completed by our team with the assistance of intraoperative CT, and collected their medical data, including preoperative imaging manifestations, surgical conditions, and intraoperative imaging images for evaluation. Results:During the study period, 23 difficult cases(27 ears) underwent cochlear implantation under the guidance of intraoperative CT, and 4 cases were bilaterally implanted. Including 6 cases of incomplete segmentation type Ⅰ(IP-Ⅰ), 1 case of incomplete segmentation type Ⅱ(IP-Ⅱ), 10 cases of incomplete segmentation type Ⅲ(IP-Ⅲ), 3 cases of common cavity deformity(CC) and 3 cases of cochlear ossification after meningitis. Facial nerve anatomy was abnormal in 9 cases, cerebrospinal fluid "blowout" was serious in 14 cases, electrode position was abnormal in 3 cases requiring intraoperative adjustment of electrode position, anatomical difficulties required intraoperative CT to assist in finding anatomical landmarks in 2 cases, and electrodes were not fully implanted in 3 cases. Conclusion:When faced with difficult cases with challenging and complex temporal bone anatomy, intraoperative CT can accurately evaluate the electrode position and provide intraoperative anatomical details, allowing immediate adjustment of the electrode position if necessary, providing safety guarantee for difficult cases of cochlear implant surgery and ensure accurate implantation of electrodes.


Subject(s)
Humans , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Cochlea , Cochlear Implants
7.
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery ; (12): 310-312, 2023.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-982739

ABSTRACT

Electrode array misplacement is a rare complication of cochlear implant. This article reports an 11-year-old boy who was mistakenly implanted the cochlear electrode array into the superior semicircular canal during the initial cochlear implant. After the diagnosis was confirmed, he underwent a second cochlear implant and the electrode array were successfully implanted into the cochlea. This article conducted a systematic review of the literature on electrode array misplacement, and the causes of electrode array misplacement were analyzed from different implantation position.


Subject(s)
Male , Humans , Child , Electrodes, Implanted , Reoperation , Cochlea , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Semicircular Canals/surgery
8.
Rev. CEFAC ; 25(5): e5223, 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1521541

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Purpose: to synthesize the evidence of available studies in the literature regarding the benefit of the cochlear implant in children with additional diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder and to verify the protocols used to validate the abilities of auditory perception and oral language of this population. Methods: an integrative literature review, searching in LILACS, MEDLINE/PubMed and SciELO databases and in the Google Scholar. Studies in Portuguese and English that assessed auditory and/or spoken language skills of children using cochlear implants with autism spectrum disorder were included. Literature Review: 16 studies were included. In 72.18% of cases, autism spectrum disorder was diagnosed when the child was already using a cochlear implant. Studies have shown limited benefit from cochlear implants for the studied population. Parents need to be oriented regarding their expectations about the use of the device. Conclusion: the benefit of using a cochlear implant for children with an additional diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder is limited and lower than the results obtained by children who do not have additional diagnoses. There is no standardized protocol for assessing auditory and language skills in this population.


RESUMO Objetivo: sintetizar as evidências de estudos disponíveis na literatura a respeito do benefício do implante coclear em crianças com diagnóstico adicional de transtorno do espectro autista e verificar quais os protocolos utilizados para a avaliação das habilidades de percepção auditiva e de linguagem falada dessa população. Métodos: trata-se de revisão integrativa da literatura. A busca foi realizada nas bases de dados LILACS, PubMed e SciELO e no Google Acadêmico. Foram incluídos estudos nos idiomas português e inglês, que avaliaram habilidades auditivas e/ou de linguagem falada de crianças usuárias de implante coclear com transtorno do espectro autista. Revisão de Literatura: 16 estudos foram incluídos. Em 72,18% dos casos, o diagnóstico do transtorno do espectro autista foi concluído quando a criança já fazia uso do implante coclear. Os estudos demonstram benefício limitado do dispositivo para a população estudada. É necessário que os pais sejam orientados a respeito das expectativas com o uso do dispositivo. Conclusão: o benefício obtido pelo uso do implante coclear por crianças com diagnóstico adicional de transtorno do espectro autista é limitado e inferior aos resultados obtidos por crianças que não apresentam diagnósticos adicionais. Não há um protocolo padronizado para a avaliação das habilidades auditivas e de linguagem dessa população.

9.
Rev. CEFAC ; 25(6): e4023, 2023. tab
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1521550

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Autism Spectrum Disorder is not an adverse condition for cochlear implantation, but the goals and expectations about the effects on hearing and language outcomes are different from the group of children without other impairments. The objective of this study was to analyze the development of auditory and oral language skills of a child with autism who underwent early cochlear implantation surgery and was included in an auditory (re)habilitation program using the aural-oral method. There was no benefit from the device for the development of oral language, and the child was referred to another communicative method. After 2 years and 9 months using the cochlear implants, there was little benefit from the use of the device for the development of auditory skills, with the child evolving to recognize only his own name. The patient quit using the device after three years of its activation.


RESUMO O transtorno do espectro autista não é uma contraindicação para o implante coclear, mas as metas e expectativas sobre os efeitos nos resultados da audição e da linguagem são diferentes em relação ao grupo de crianças sem outros comprometimentos. O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar o desenvolvimento das habilidades auditivas e de linguagem falada de uma criança com transtorno do espectro autista submetida precocemente à cirurgia de implante coclear e inserida em um programa de (re)habilitação auditiva no método aurioral. Observou-se que não houve benefício do dispositivo para o desenvolvimento da linguagem falada, tendo a criança sido encaminhada para outro método comunicativo. Em 2 anos e 9 meses de uso do implante coclear, observou-se pouco benefício do uso do dispositivo para o desenvolvimento das habilidades auditivas, havendo a evolução para o reconhecimento somente do próprio nome. A criança deixou de fazer uso dos dispositivos após três anos da ativação.

10.
Rev. CEFAC ; 25(6): e8523, 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1529396

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Purpose: to map, through a scoping review, the contributions of musical approaches to developing auditory, speech, and language skills in children and adolescents using cochlear implants (CIs). Methods: a review conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and registered in PROSPERO, under the review registration number CRD42020205581. A bibliographic search was carried out in databases in 2020 and updated in August 2023. No date or language limits were applied. Literature Review: altogether, 1,351 studies were found through the search strategy. After the eligibility assessment based on the PCC strategy, 11 studies were selected and analyzed in full text. Conclusion: the studies have demonstrated that musical approaches contribute to developing auditory, speech, and language skills in children and adolescents using CIs.


RESUMO Objetivo: mapear, por meio de uma revisão de escopo, os contributos das abordagens musicais para o desenvolvimento das habilidades auditivas, de fala e linguagem de crianças e adolescentes usuários de implante coclear (IC). Métodos: esta revisão foi conduzida de acordo com o Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and the Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) e registrada no PROSPERO com o número de registro da revisão: CRD42020205581. Foi realizada uma busca bibliográfica nas bases de dados em 2020 e atualizada em agosto de 2023. Não foram aplicados limites de data e idioma. Revisão da Literatura: foram encontrados 1.351 estudos por meio da estratégia de busca e após a avaliação de elegibilidade baseada pela estratégia PCC, 11 estudos foram selecionados e analisados na íntegra. Conclusão: os estudos demonstraram que as abordagens musicais contribuem para o desenvolvimento das habilidades auditivas, de fala e linguagem de crianças e adolescentes usuários de IC.

11.
Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 88(supl.3): 50-58, Nov.-Dec. 2022. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1420832

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective: There are few studies on long-latency auditory evoked potential (P300) in people with hearing loss who use a cochlear implant. Central auditory system evaluation with behavioral and electrophysiological tests is believed to help understand the neuroplasticity mechanisms involved in auditory functioning after cochlear implant surgery. This study investigated the electrophysiological processing of cortical level acoustic signals in a group of 21 adult individuals with postlingual bilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss who were submitted to cochlear implant surgery. Methods: Data were collected in three phases: pre-cochlear implant surgery, at cochlear implant activation, and 6 months after surgery. P300 measures were also registered during all phases. Tone-burst and speech stimuli were used to elicit P300 and were presented in free field. Results: Mean P3 component latency with tone-burst and speech stimuli were 352.9 and 321.9 ms in the pre-cochlear implant phase, 364.9 and 368.7 ms in the activation phase, 336.2 and 343.6 ms 6 months after the surgery. The P3 component mean latency values using tone-burst at activation were significantly different from those 6 months after cochlear implant. They were also significantly different using speech, between pre-cochlear implant and activation phases. Lower P3 component latency occurred 6 months after cochlear implant activation with tone-burst and pre-cochlear implant with speech stimulus. There was a weak correlation between mean P3 component latency with speech stimulus and time of hearing loss. There was no difference in amplitude between phases or in the comparison with the other variables. Conclusion: There were changes in P3 component latency during the period assessed, for both speech and pure-tone stimuli, with increased latency in the activation phase and similar lower results in the two other phases, Pre-CI and 6 months after CI use. Mean amplitude measures did not vary in the three phases.

12.
Distúrb. comun ; 34(3): 55560, set. 2022. ilus, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1415257

ABSTRACT

Introdução: O implante coclear beneficia o indivíduo com perda auditiva tanto no desenvolvimento da linguagem, quanto no aprimoramento da percepção dos sons da fala. A cirurgia do implante coclear bem-sucedida, somada à estimulação adequada e ao monitoramento correto, proporcionam um melhor desenvolvimento das habilidades auditivas e de linguagem das crianças. Nesse sentido, além de controlar as variáveis de idade na cirurgia e acesso à terapia fonoaudiológica para o desenvolvimento das habilidades auditivas e de linguagem, conhecer as famílias e de que maneira ela influencia no desempenho das crianças é extremamente válido, pois pode melhorar o acolhimento e direcionar melhor o aconselhamento. Objetivo: verificar a relação entre as categorias de audição e de linguagem considerando a idade na cirurgia e a relação entre as categorias de audição, linguagem e de envolvimento familiar em crianças usuárias de implante coclear. Método: A amostra estudada foi composta por 15 crianças com idade entre 2,2 e 8,3 anos. Foram utilizados questionários que mensuravam a percepção auditiva, a percepção de fala e o uso da linguagem pelas crianças. Foi aplicada também a escala de avaliação do envolvimento familiar para o auxílio na categorização das crianças a partir da audição e da linguagem. Resultados: Houve relação significante entre categorias de audição e envolvimento familiar e audição e linguagem. Não houve relação entre a idade da criança na cirurgia e as categorias de audição e de linguagem. Também não houve relação entre o envolvimento familiar e linguagem. Conclusão: A idade da criança na implantação do dispositivo não se relacionou com a classificação das categorias de audição e de linguagem. As crianças de famílias mais participativas apresentaram melhores índices de desenvolvimento auditivo.


Introduction: Cochlear implant benefits the individual with hearing loss both in language development and in improving the perception of speech sounds. Successful cochlear implant surgery, coupled with adequate stimulation and correct monitoring, provide a better development of children's hearing and language skills. In this sense, in addition to controlling the variables of age at surgery and access to speech therapy for the development of auditory and language skills, knowing the families and how it influences the children's performance is extremely valid, as it can improve the reception and better target counseling. Objective: To verify the relationship between the categories of hearing and language considering the age at surgery and the relationship between the categories of hearing, language and family involvement in children with cochlear implants. Method: The studied sample consisted of 15 children aged between 2.2 and 8.3 years. Questionnaires were used that measured auditory perception, speech perception and language use by children. The family involvement assessment scale was also applied to help categorize children based on hearing and language. Results: There was a significant relationship between hearing and family involvement and hearing and language categories. There was no relationship between the child's age at surgery and the hearing and language categories. There was also no relationship between family involvement and language. Conclusion: The child's age at device implantation was not related to the classification of hearing and language categories. Children from more participatory families presented better rates of auditory development.


Introducción: El implante coclear beneficia al individuo con pérdida auditiva tanto en el desarrollo del lenguaje como en la mejora de la percepción de los sonidos del habla. La cirugía exitosa de implante coclear, aunada a una estimulación adecuada y un correcto monitoreo, brindan un mejor desarrollo de las habilidades auditivas y del lenguaje de los niños. En este sentido, además de controlar las variables edad de la cirugía y acceso a logopedia para el desarrollo de las habilidades auditivas y del lenguaje, conocer a las familias y cómo influye en el desempeño de los niños es de gran validez, ya que puede mejorar la recepción y mejor asesoramiento de destino. Objetivo: Verificar la relación entre las categorías de audición y lenguaje considerando la edad en la cirugía y la relación entre las categorías de audición, lenguaje y envolvimiento familiar en niños con implante coclear. Método: La muestra estudiada estuvo constituida por 15 niños con edades comprendidas entre 2,2 y 8,3 años. Se utilizaron cuestionarios que midieron la percepción auditiva, la percepción del habla y el uso del lenguaje por parte de los niños. También se aplicó la escala de evaluación de la participación familiar para ayudar a categorizar a los niños en función de la audición y el lenguaje. Resultados: Hubo una relación significativa entre las categorías de audición y participación familiar y audición y lenguaje. No hubo relación entre la edad del niño en el momento de la cirugía y las categorías de audición y lenguaje. Tampoco hubo relación entre la participación familiar y el lenguaje. Conclusión: La edad del niño en el momento de la implantación del dispositivo no se relacionó con la clasificación de las categorías de audición y lenguaje. Los niños de familias más participativas presentaron mejores índices de desarrollo auditivo.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Child , Cochlear Implantation , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Child Language , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hearing , Language Development
13.
Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 88(3): 390-398, May-June 2022. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1384177

ABSTRACT

Abstract Introduction Cochlear implantation is an effective treatment method for severe to profound hearing loss. Many factors that may influence cochlear implantation success have been explained in previous studies. Apart from those, minor differences in size of normal cochlear nerves may affect postoperative performance. Objective To investigate whether the minor differences in cochlear nerve size in normal cochlear nerves affect postoperative cochlear implant performance. Methods 30 pediatric prelingually deaf patients who were treated with cochlear implantation were included in this study. From the reconstructed parasagittal magnetic resonance images, the diameter and cross-sectional area of the cochlear nerve on the ipsilateral and contralateral side were measured. Auditory evaluations were performed 1, 3, 6 and 12 months following the first fitting. All the analysis was performed by using EARS®, evaluation of auditory responses to speech tool. Correlation between cochlear nerve diameter, cross-sectional area and postoperative auditory perception was analyzed to determine whether variation in cochlear nerve size contributes to postoperative auditory performance. Results The mean diameter of the cochlear nerve on the ipsilateral side was 718.4 μm (504.5 − 904.3 μm) and mean cross sectional area was 0.015 cm2 (0.012 − 0.018 cm2). On the contralateral side the mean cochlear nerve diameter was 714.4 μm (502.6 − 951.4 μm) and mean cross sectional area was 0.014 cm2 (0.011 − 0.019 cm2). The correlation between the diameter and cross-sectional area of the ipsilateral and contralateral cochlear nerve revealed no significance. Mean score at first month monosyllable-trochee-polysyllable test, MTP1, was 0.17 (0.08 − 0.33), at 6th month with 6 words test, 6th month MTP6 was 0.72 (0.39 − 1.0), at 6th month with 12 words, 6th month MTP 12 was 0.46 (0.17 − 0.75) and at 12th month with 12 words, 12th month MTP12 was 0.73 (0.25 − 1.0). There was no correlation between the monosyllable-trochee-polysyllable test, values at any time with the diameter of the ipsilateral cochlear nerve. However, the first month MTP, 6th month MTP6 and 12th month MTP12 correlated with the cross-sectional area of the ipsilateral cochlear nerve. Conclusion Measuring the cross sectional area of the normal- appearing cochlear nerve may give important prognostic knowledge on cochlear implant outcomes. In patients with a larger cross sectional area the auditory performance was better and faster. Although normal appearing, slight differences on cross sectional area of the cochlear nerve may affect performance. Measuring the size of the cochlear nerve on parasagittal magnetic resonance images may provide beneficial information on the postoperative rehabilitation process.


Resumo Introdução O implante coclear é um método de tratamento eficaz para a perda auditiva grave a profunda. Muitos fatores que podem influenciar o sucesso do implante coclear foram explicados em estudos anteriores. Além desses fatores, pequenas diferenças no tamanho dos nervos cocleares normais podem afetar o desempenho pós-operatório. Objetivo Investigar se pequenas diferenças no tamanho dos nervos cocleares normais afetam o desempenho pós-operatório do implante coclear. Método Foram incluídos neste estudo 30 pacientes pediátricos surdos pré-linguais, tratados com implante coclear. A partir de imagens de ressonância magnética parassagitais reconstruídas, foram medidos o diâmetro e a área de seção transversal do nervo coclear no lado ipsilateral e contralateral. As avaliações auditivas foram feitas 1, 3, 6 e 12 meses após a primeira adaptação. Todas as análises foram feitas com a ferramenta EARS® (do inglês evaluation of auditory responses to speech). A correlação entre o diâmetro do nervo coclear, a área transversal e a percepção auditiva pós-operatória foi analisada para determinar se a variação no tamanho do nervo coclear contribui para o desempenho auditivo pós-operatório. Resultados O diâmetro médio do nervo coclear no lado ipsilateral foi de 718,4 μm (504,5 a 904,3 μm) e a área da seção transversal média foi de 0,015 cm2 (0,012-0,018 cm2). No lado contralateral, o diâmetro médio do nervo coclear foi de 714,4 μm (502,6 a 951,4 μm) e a área da seção transversal média foi de 0,014 cm2 (0,011 a 0,019 cm2). A correlação entre o diâmetro e a área transversal do nervo coclear ipsilateral e contralateral não revelou qualquer significância. O escore médio do teste monosyllable-trochee-polysyllable no primeiro mês, denominado MTP1, foi de 0,17 (0,08-0,33), no sexto mês com teste de 6 palavras, MTP6, foi de 0,72 (0,39-1,0), no sexto mês com 12 palavras, MTP12, foi de 0,46 (0,17-0,75) e no 12° mês com 12 palavras, MTP12, foi de 0,73 (0,25-1,0). Não houve correlação entre os valores do teste monosyllable-trochee-polysyllable em qualquer momento com o diâmetro do nervo coclear ipsilateral. Entretanto, o teste monosyllable-trochee-polysyllable do primeiro mês, do 6° mês, e o do 12° mês correlacionaram-se com a área transversal do nervo coclear ipsilateral. Conclusão Medir a área da secção transversal do nervo coclear de aparência normal pode fornecer conhecimento prognóstico importante sobre os resultados do implante coclear. Em pacientes com área da secção transversal maior, o desempenho auditivo foi melhor e mais rápido. Embora o nervo coclear pareça normal, pequenas diferenças na área da secção transversal do nervo coclear podem afetar o desempenho, de forma que a medida do tamanho do nervo coclear nas imagens de ressonância magnética na projeção parassagital pode fornecer informações benéficas sobre o processo de reabilitação pós-operatória.

14.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-225700

ABSTRACT

Cochlear implantation is indicated in patients with severe to profound hearing loss that cannot be adequately treated by other auditory rehabilitation measures.The definitive indication of cochlear implantation is made on the basis of an extensive interdisciplinary clinical,audiological,radiological, and psychological diagnostic work-up.There are numerous changes are happening in cochlear implant candidacy.These have been associated with concomitant changes in surgical techniques,which enhanced the utility and safety of cochlear implantation.Currently, cochlear implants are approved for individuals with severe to profound unilateral hearing loss rather than previously needed for bilateral profound hearing loss.Studies have begun using the short electrode arrays for shallow insertion in patients with low-frequency residual hearing loss.The advancement in designs of thecochlear implant along with improvements in surgical techniques reduce the complications and result in the safety and efficacy of the cochlear implant which further encourages the use of these devices.This review article aims to discuss the new concepts in the candidacy of the cochlear implant,cochlear implant in younger children and hearing preservation,a cochlear implant for unilateral deafness,bilateral cochlear implant, and cochlear implant with neural plasticity and selection of patients for the cochlear implant.

15.
CoDAS ; 34(1): e20200422, 2022. tab, graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1356140

ABSTRACT

RESUMO Objetivo Traduzir para o idioma português a ferramenta My Experience Book, avaliar o conteúdo da tradução, o nível de legibilidade, a qualidade e a identidade visual do material e disponibilizá-lo online. Método Estudo descritivo, transversal, de caráter quantitativo e qualitativo. Os procedimentos contaram com cinco etapas, sendo: tradução do material; avaliação e resposta ao questionário 1 referente à tradução; determinação da validade do conteúdo; avaliação da legibilidade; disponibilização do material online e avaliação do conteúdo voltado à qualidade e a identidade visual (questionário 2). Participaram do estudo três fonoaudiólogos, juízes e 22 profissionais (fonoaudiólogos e médicos otorrinolaringologistas de serviços de saúde auditiva e reabilitação). Resultados A tradução do material apresentou taxas de concordância de validade maiores que 90%. A legibilidade classificou o material com nível fácil de leitura. Dentre os 184 profissionais convidados, 22 concordaram com a participação, demonstrando baixa adesão ao estudo. A maior parte dos respondentes concordaram positivamente com os aspectos relacionados ao conteúdo e coerência do material traduzido, vídeos, imagens ilustrativas e legendas. O material também foi considerado importante pela maioria dos avaliadores. Todos os fonoaudiólogos referiram fazer uso do instrumento na prática clínica. Conclusão O material traduzido referente à ferramenta é de grande relevância, pois reúne informações práticas voltadas à criação de um caderno de experiências, bem como orientações quanto ao uso do instrumento como recurso adicional para a estimulação do desenvolvimento das habilidades auditivas e de linguagem de crianças com deficiência auditiva.


ABSTRACT Purpose To translate the My Experience Book toll into Portuguese, evaluate the translation content, readability, quality, and visual identity of the material, and make it available online. Methods Descriptive, cross-sectional, quantitative, and qualitative study. The procedures consisted of five stages: translation of the material; evaluation and response to questionnaire one regarding translation; determining the validity of the content; readability assessment; availability of material online and evaluation of content aimed at quality and visual identity (questionnaire two). Twenty-five professionals (audiologists and physicians) participated in the study. Results The translation of the notebook showed validity agreement rates greater than 90%. Readability rated the material easy to read. Among the 184 invited professionals, only 25 agreed to participate, demonstrating low adherence to the study. Most respondents agreed positively about the content and consistency of the translated material, videos, illustrative images, and captions. The material was also considered necessary by the majority of the evaluators. All audiologists reported using the instrument in clinical practice. Conclusion The translated toll is of great relevance. It gathers practical information to create a notebook of experiences and guidance on using the material as an additional resource to stimulate the auditory skills of children with hearing impairment.

16.
Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 25(3): 407-412, Jul.-Sept. 2021. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1340009

ABSTRACT

Abstract Introduction Individual variability in the language outcomes of children with cochlear implantation (CI) is a major concern. In CI rehabilitation, there is lack of a protocol regarding uniform post-CI language assessment interval duration, which can ensure better understanding of the trajectory of language growth as well as optimize language outcomes by providing feedback in fine tuning the language intervention program. Objective To evaluate the receptive and expressive language in Hindi speaking children with up to 2 years of CI experience using revised receptive-expressive emergent language test-3ed. (REELT-3) at 6 months intervals and to compare it with that of children with normal hearing (NH). Methods The present study included 192 children divided in 2 groups, 96 children with CI (15.8 ± 6.7 months), and 96 age-matched children with NH (22.3 ± 7.9 months). A cross-sectional, prospective study design was used to measure the language ability score (LAS) at an interval of 6 months from the time of implantation (TIA), which is 0 to 6 months, 7 to 12 months, 13 to 18 months, and 19 to 24 months of CI usage. Results The two-way analysis of variance revealed that the LAS after 18 months of CI usage was similar to (F (3, 92) = 8.63, p= 0.19, ηp2 = 0.028) that of the children with NH. However, other demographic factors, for instance, gender (F (3, 92) = 1.73, p= 0.505, ηp2 = 0.002), parent's education, (F (3, 92) = 2.05, p= 0.937, ηp2 = 0.031), and financial background (F (3, 92) = 2.49, p= 0.351, ηp2 = 0.076) had no major impact on language. Conclusion Eighteen months of CI usage duration can potentially stimulate receptive and expressive language up to age-matched children with NH. A protocol of periodic assessment of language, at least of 6 months, may be developed to optimize language outcomes.

17.
Med. UIS ; 34(2): 19-28, mayo-ago. 2021. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1375816

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN Introducción: La cirugía del implante coclear es un método efectivo para la rehabilitación auditiva de los pacientes con hipoacusia neurosensorial severo-profunda, en los que el rendimiento con los audífonos no es suficiente. Aunque la implantación coclear es una técnica segura, es importante conocer sus posibles complicaciones, entre ellas la infección del colgajo o la parálisis facial. Objetivo: Analizar las complicaciones de los pacientes con implante coclear intervenidos en un hospital universitario terciario: El Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset de Valencia, desde enero de 2001 a marzo de 2020. Metodología: Estudio observacional descriptivo de las complicaciones en una muestra de 134 pacientes con implantación coclear en el Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset de Valencia, en un periodo de 20 años. En el análisis estadístico se utilizó estadística descriptiva. Para demostrar diferencias significativas entre variables empleamos el programa R. Se utilizó el test χ2 para proporciones, considerando significativo un valor p < 0.05. Resultados: 134 pacientes fueron implantados. La frecuencia global de complicaciones fue del 17.9%, 4.5% fueron complicaciones mayores y 13.4% fueron complicaciones menores. La complicación más frecuente fue la desactivación o inserción incompleta de algunos electrodos. Discusión: Las proporciones de complicaciones del estudio entran dentro de los rangos encontrados en la literatura (14.9-18.3%). La frecuencia de complicaciones mayores es inferior al 5%, proporción similar a la obtenida en nuestra serie. Conclusiones: El implante coclear es una técnica quirúrgica segura para la rehabilitación de pacientes con hipoacusia severa, aunque no está exenta de riesgo, por lo que se debe conocer sus potenciales complicaciones. MÉD.UIS.2021;34(2):19-28.


ABSTRACT Introduction: Cochlear implantation is an effective method for hearing rehabilitation in patients with severe neurosensory hearing loss in which hearing aids do not provide good discrimination. Although cochlear implantation is a safe technique, adverse effects related to surgery have been described, including flap infection or facial paralysis. Objective: To analyze the complications of cochlear implanted patients in a tertiary university hospital: The Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset of Valencia, from January 2001 to March 2020. Methodology: This is a descriptive observational study of the complications in a sample of 134 patients with cochlear implant surgery in The Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset of Valencia in a period of 20 years. Descriptive statistics were used in the statistical analysis. To demonstrate significant differences between variables we used the R program. The χ2 test was used for proportions, considering significant a p value < 0.05. Results: 134 patients were implanted. The global frequency of complications was 17.9%, 4.5% were major complications and 13.4% were minor complications. The most frequent complication was inactivation or incomplete insertion of some electrodes. Discussion: Our complication rate is within the range published in the literature (14.9-18.3%). The major complication rate is 5% which is similar to our series. Conclusions: The cochlear implant is a safe surgical technique for the rehabilitation of patients with severe neurosensory hearing loss, although it is not riskless, therefore, one must know that complication are possible. MÉD.UIS.2021;34(2):19-28


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Postoperative Complications , Cochlear Implants , Cochlear Implantation , Hearing Loss
18.
Rev. cienc. med. Pinar Rio ; 25(4): e5063, 2021.
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1341231

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN Introducción: el lenguaje oral está basado principalmente en la información acústica. La hipoacusia es la pérdida parcial de la capacidad auditiva. A partir de los 40 decibelios en adelante, su presencia repercute en la adquisición de las funciones del lenguaje y el desarrollo integral del niño. Objetivo: describir la evolución de un caso clínico hipoacúsico con implante coclear, tras la aplicación de una terapia auditivo-verbal. Presentación de caso: se presenta un niño de 10 años y siete meses de edad, con retraso en el desarrollo del lenguaje debido a una Hipoacusia Neurosensorial Bilateral Profunda de presunto origen congénito. Después de ser diagnosticado tempranamente con esta enfermedad, fue incluido en el Programa Nacional de Implante Coclear con vistas a mejorar sus capacidades auditivas y facilitar así la retroalimentación auditiva. Luego de la cirugía se le comenzó a aplicar una terapia auditivo verbal para propiciar la adquisición adecuada de las funciones del lenguaje. Conclusiones: los niños con problemas de audición pueden aprender a escuchar y a hablar mediante un diagnóstico y una intervención temprana, la tecnología apropiada y con la dedicación de padres y terapeutas que comparten la visión de darle voz al futuro del niño. Es importante tener en cuenta que el tratamiento adecuado, la capacidad intelectual de los niños y el ambiente familiar, condicionan la evolución exitosa de las terapias aplicadas.


ABSTRACT Introduction: oral language is mainly based on acoustic information. Hypoacusis is the partial loss of hearing capacity; from 40 decibels and above, its presence has an impact on the acquisition of language functions and the overall development of the child. Objective: to describe the evolution of a clinical case of a hearing impaired patient with cochlear implant after the application of an auditory-verbal therapy. Case report: a 10-year-old and 7 months boy with delayed language development due to a Deep Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss of presumed congenital origin, after being diagnosed early with this disease he was included in the National Cochlear Implant Program in order to improve his hearing abilities and thus facilitate auditory feedback. After surgery, he began to undergo auditory-verbal therapy to promote the proper acquisition of language functions. Conclusions: hearing impaired children can learn to listen and speak through early diagnosis and intervention, appropriate technology and with the perseverance of parents and therapists who share the vision of giving voice to the future of the child. It is important to keep in mind that the appropriate treatment, the intellectual capacity of children and the family environment condition the successful evolution of the therapies applied.

19.
Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 87(4): 379-388, July-Aug. 2021. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1285718

ABSTRACT

Abstract Introduction The hair cells of the cochlea and the vestibulum are closely connected and may be susceptible to the same noxious factors. The relationship between their function has been a continuing field of investigation. The indications for cochlear implantation have been broadened and now include the patients with partial deafness. This raises the question of their vestibular status. Objective The aim of the study was to investigate whether there is any difference between the vestibular function of patients with low frequency residual hearing and those with totally deaf ears. Methods A total of 360 ears with profound sensorineural hearing loss were analysed before cochlear implantation. The patients were divided into four groups, according to their low frequency residual hearing (Group 1 ‒ normal or slightly elevated low frequency residual hearing; Group 2 ‒ elevated threshold but still usable hearing at low frequencies; Group 3 - non-functional residual hearing; Group 4 ‒ no detectable hearing threshold within the limits of the audiometer). The patients underwent vestibular tests: cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential, ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential, caloric test and video-head impulse test. Results The rates of elicited responses in cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential were as follows: in Group 1 (59.3 %); Group 2 (57.5 %); Group 3 (35.2 %); Group 4 (7.7 %). For ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential the percentage of correct outcomes was: Group 1 (70.8 %); Group 2 (56.0 %); Group 3 (40.0 %); Group 4 (14.3 %). For the caloric test we counted normal responses in 88.9 % of Group 1; 81.6 % of Group 2; 57.9 % of Group 3; 53.3 % of Group 4. For video-head impulse test we also found markedly better results in Group1, followed by Group 2, and much worse in Group 3 and 4. Conclusion Patients with partial deafness not only have a better cochlea but also better vestibular function, which needs to be protected. In summary, the better the low frequency residual hearing, the better the vestibular status.


Resumo Introdução As células ciliadas da cóclea e do vestíbulo estão intimamente ligadas e podem ser suscetíveis aos mesmos fatores nocivos. A relação entre suas funções tem sido um campo de investigação há muito tempo. As indicações para implante coclear foram ampliadas e agora incluem os pacientes com surdez parcial. Isso levanta a questão de sua condição vestibular. Objetivo Investigar se existe alguma diferença entre a função vestibular de pacientes com audição residual de baixa frequência e aqueles com surdez total. Método Foram analisadas antes do implante coclear 360 orelhas com perda auditiva neurossensorial profunda. Os pacientes foram divididos em quatro grupos, de acordo com a audição residual de baixa frequência (Grupo 1 - audição residual de baixa frequência normal ou levemente elevada; Grupo 2 - limiar auditivo elevado, mas ainda usável em baixas frequências; Grupo 3 - audição residual não funcional; Grupo 4 - sem limiar auditivo detectável dentro dos limites do audiômetro). Os pacientes foram submetidos a testes vestibulares: potencial evocado miogênico vestibular cervical, potencial evocado miogênico vestibular ocular, prova calórica e teste do impulso cefálico com vídeo. Resultados As taxas de respostas obtidas no potencial evocado miogênico vestibular cervical foram as seguintes: no Grupo 1 (59,3%); Grupo 2 (57,5%); Grupo 3 (35,2%); Grupo 4 (7,7%). Para o potencial evocado miogênico vestibular ocular, o percentual de resultados corretos foi: Grupo 1 (70,8%); Grupo 2 (56,0%); Grupo 3 (40,0%); Grupo 4 (14,3%). Para a prova calórica, contamos respostas normais em 88,9% do Grupo 1; 81,6% do grupo 2; 57,9% do Grupo 3; 53,3% do Grupo 4. Para o teste do impulso cefálico com vídeo, também encontramos resultados significativamente melhores no Grupo 1, seguidos pelo Grupo 2, e muito piores nos Grupos 3 e 4. Conclusão Pacientes com surdez parcial não só apresentam uma função coclear melhor, mas também melhor função vestibular, que precisa ser protegida. Em resumo, quanto melhor for a audição residual de baixa frequência, melhor a condição vestibular.


Subject(s)
Humans , Vestibule, Labyrinth , Deafness , Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials , Caloric Tests , Head Impulse Test
20.
CoDAS ; 33(1): e20190153, 2021. tab, graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1249595

ABSTRACT

RESUMO Objetivo Verificar como a qualidade de vida de crianças com implante coclear foi avaliada em estudos publicados e analisar criticamente quais foram as variáveis influenciadoras. Estratégia de pesquisa Pesquisa norteada pelas recomendações do PRISMA. A pergunta norteadora foi elaborada com base na estratégia PICO, sendo: "Quais variáveis são consideradas como influenciadoras sobre a qualidade de vida de crianças com implante coclear?". Os descritores selecionados foram: implante coclear, implantes cocleares, qualidade de vida, criança e seus sinônimos, nos idiomas português, inglês e espanhol. Foram identificados estudos indexados nas bases de dados: Pubmed/MEDLINE, LILACS, Scopus, SciELO, Embase, EBSCO/CINAHL e Web of Science. Critérios de seleção Foram selecionados estudos direcionados ao tema, com níveis de evidência científica de 1 a 4, publicados nos idiomas português, inglês e espanhol, no período de 2009 a 2018. Análise dos dados: inicialmente analisou-se os títulos de todos os estudos encontrados, seguido dos resumos e da leitura na íntegra dos textos mais relevantes. Resultados Após a análise rigorosa dos 1062 artigos, oito foram classificados como contendo as respostas necessárias à pergunta norteadora de pesquisa. Os estudos selecionados foram publicados entre os anos de 2009 a 2016, classificados em nível de evidência 2a e 4, com casuística entre dez a 259 crianças e com idades entre 18 meses a 18 anos incompletos. Conclusão Os fatores influenciadores que se correlacionaram com a qualidade de vida das crianças com implante coclear foram: a implantação precoce, o uso do dispositivo eletrônico, as habilidades auditivas e as habilidades de linguagem.


ABSTRACT Purpose To verify how the quality of life of children with cochlear implant was evaluated in published studies and to critically analyze which were the influencing variables. Research Strategy Research guided by PRISMA recommendations. The guiding question was elaborated based on the PICO strategy, being: "Which variables are considered as influencers on the quality of life of children with cochlear implants?" The selected descriptors were cochlear implants, cochlear implants, quality of life, child and their synonyms, in the Portuguese, English and Spanish languages. We have identified indexed studies in the databases: Pubmed / MEDLINE, LILACS, Scopus, SciELO, Embase, EBSCO / CINAHL and Web of Science. Selection Criteria Selected studies were selected, with levels of scientific evidence from 1 to 4, published in the Portuguese, English and Spanish languages, from 2009 to 2018. Data analysis: initially the titles of all the studies, followed by summaries and full reading of the most relevant texts. Results After the rigorous analysis of the 1062 articles, eight were classified as containing the necessary answers to the guiding question of research. The selected studies were published between 2009 and 2016, classified as evidence level 2a and 4, with a sample of between 10 and 259 children and between the ages of 18 months and 18 years. Conclusion The influencing factors that correlated with the quality of life of children with cochlear implants were early implantation, use of the electronic device, hearing skills and language skills.


Subject(s)
Humans , Infant , Child , Speech Perception , Cochlear Implants , Cochlear Implantation , Quality of Life , Language
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL